<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Budget Guns &#8211; 038</title>
	<atom:link href="http://handgunpodcast.com/budget-guns-038/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://handgunpodcast.com/budget-guns-038/</link>
	<description>"If handguns cause crime, mine's defective"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://handgunpodcast.com/budget-guns-038/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handgunpodcast.com/?p=284#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I own a Hi Point and yes it has it flaws but I believe that it is an effective carry weapon-- after you break it in. I listened to this podcast  and the previous one. All I&#039;m saying is that you&#039;re entitled to your opinion. Hell.. I was ready to get a refund after I fired it the first time. But I gave the gun a second chance. I own a C9.. Would&#039;ve rather a .40 or .45 as a SD gun but it was all I could&#039;ve afford and I&#039;ve made good what what I have. Point is that I have fell in love with Hp&#039;s and I&#039;m looking at upgrading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a Hi Point and yes it has it flaws but I believe that it is an effective carry weapon&#8211; after you break it in. I listened to this podcast  and the previous one. All I&#8217;m saying is that you&#8217;re entitled to your opinion. Hell.. I was ready to get a refund after I fired it the first time. But I gave the gun a second chance. I own a C9.. Would&#8217;ve rather a .40 or .45 as a SD gun but it was all I could&#8217;ve afford and I&#8217;ve made good what what I have. Point is that I have fell in love with Hp&#8217;s and I&#8217;m looking at upgrading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 916_Pilot</title>
		<link>http://handgunpodcast.com/budget-guns-038/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>916_Pilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handgunpodcast.com/?p=284#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Man, let me tell you that the banter between you and the GunDudes is great.  I found them by accident, and they steered me to your show.  Now I&#039;m torn as to which one I like better.  Great show!  Now I&#039;m going to go leave feedback on iTunes.  Keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, let me tell you that the banter between you and the GunDudes is great.  I found them by accident, and they steered me to your show.  Now I&#8217;m torn as to which one I like better.  Great show!  Now I&#8217;m going to go leave feedback on iTunes.  Keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Savage</title>
		<link>http://handgunpodcast.com/budget-guns-038/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>The Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handgunpodcast.com/?p=284#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Good show, Eric!  Here&#039;s my personal datapoint.  My first gun is a used SIG P-225.  When I got it, it shot to the left of where the sights were pointed and there was certain ammo it choked on (namely Cor-bon--and it still does).  Soon after the Kel-tec P-11 came out, I got one.  It eats up everything I&#039;ve ever fed it and comes back for more (especially that Cor-bon!).  The bullets hit where the sights are and there&#039;s something about that little bugger that makes it seem more accurate than it has any right to be.  If I do my job, it does its job, period.  The one thing I don&#039;t like about the Kel-tec (and it would apply to Glocks as well) is that there is no external safety of any kind.  So, if anything ever catches on the trigger (like a retention strap that gets inside the trigger guard when holstering), you get a ND (negligent discharge).  Glocks always seemed awkward to me, so I&#039;ve never bought one.  That Glock torture test has me thinking, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good show, Eric!  Here&#8217;s my personal datapoint.  My first gun is a used SIG P-225.  When I got it, it shot to the left of where the sights were pointed and there was certain ammo it choked on (namely Cor-bon&#8211;and it still does).  Soon after the Kel-tec P-11 came out, I got one.  It eats up everything I&#8217;ve ever fed it and comes back for more (especially that Cor-bon!).  The bullets hit where the sights are and there&#8217;s something about that little bugger that makes it seem more accurate than it has any right to be.  If I do my job, it does its job, period.  The one thing I don&#8217;t like about the Kel-tec (and it would apply to Glocks as well) is that there is no external safety of any kind.  So, if anything ever catches on the trigger (like a retention strap that gets inside the trigger guard when holstering), you get a ND (negligent discharge).  Glocks always seemed awkward to me, so I&#8217;ve never bought one.  That Glock torture test has me thinking, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
